Vietnamese tennis is standing at a historic crossroads. But the road ahead is far from smooth as the financial reports are painting it.

YOUNG PRODIGIES: THE BEATING HEART OF VIETNAMESE TENNIS

In a small meeting room at the National Sports Training Center on an afternoon in November 2026, as I was reviewing the ATP rankings of 47 Vietnamese tennis players, one number caught my eye: Ly Hoang Nam had dropped 217 spots in the past 18 months. That wasn't breaking news. That was the financial record of an ecosystem operating at a different speed than its expectations.

I recall 2026, when I was first invited to advise on media strategy for a tennis club in Binh Duong. Back then, I thought Vietnam had great potential to develop the sport — a market of 100 million people, a growing middle class, and a young generation being exposed to tennis through internationally televised tournaments. Eight years later, I still hold that view, but with a caution that 44 years of industry observation has taught me.

BACKGROUND: WHEN THE OLYMPIC DREAM MEETS INFRASTRUCTURE REALITY

Vietnam has set a goal of having at least one tennis player in the world's top 200 before 2030. That is the statement from the Vietnam Tennis Federation (VTF) in their 2026-2030 development strategy report. An ambitious goal, but when I analyze data from the International Tennis Federation (ITF) and the Asian Tennis Federation (ATF), there is a significant gap between ambition and current execution capacity.

According to VTF data for 2026, the country has approximately 320 competition-standard tennis courts, concentrated mainly in Ho Chi Minh City (87 courts), Hanoi (64 courts), and Da Nang (23 courts). The remaining provinces — from Can Tho to Hue, from Nha Trang to Hai Phong — have only 146 courts combined, unevenly distributed and mostly privately owned or hotel-owned. This means a young tennis prodigy in Nghe An or Thanh Hoa — areas producing potential talents — must travel hundreds of kilometers to access quality training facilities.

State budget for youth tennis in 2026 is estimated at approximately 18 billion VND, according to figures from the General Department of Sports and Training. This figure is equivalent to the operating costs of a mid-tier Premier League club for two weeks. I am not one for meaningless comparisons, but when placed alongside the top 200 world goal, it reveals a level disparity that cannot be overlooked.

ANALYSIS: THREE PILLARS AND THREE GAPS

In 44 years of following global tennis, I have witnessed many markets rise and then fade. Vietnam has three genuine competitive advantages, but also faces three structural challenges that not everyone sees.

First advantage: The amateur player market is growing. According to a VTF survey in 2026, the number of regular tennis players (at least 2 sessions/week) reached 1.2 million, a 34% increase compared to 2026. This is the foundation for a commercial ecosystem — from court rentals and equipment sales to amateur tournaments that can generate stable revenue for clubs.

Second advantage: Business community interest. Since 2026, at least 7 major corporations in Vietnam have sponsored domestic tennis tournaments or built private academies. Among them, Novaland Group sponsors the Vietnam Open with an estimated budget of 8 billion VND/year; Hoa Phat Group invested 15 billion VND to build the Hoa Phat Tennis Center in Hai Duong. This is capital that the sport needs to supplement the limited state budget.

Third advantage: Geopolitical positioning. Vietnam is located in the Asia-Pacific region — where tennis is developing fastest in the world. WTA and ATP tournaments are expanding their schedules in this area, creating opportunities for Vietnamese players to access the international competition system without investing too heavily in travel costs.

However, this is where I need to say more about what reports often overlook.

First gap: Youth training systems are scattered and lack standardization. Currently, Vietnam has approximately 45 youth tennis training centers, but only 12 of them have internationally certified coaches (ITF Level 1 or above). Most of the remaining centers operate on the "coach teaches from experience" model — effective for some naturally gifted talents, but unable to produce a stable pool of technically sound athletes.

In 2026, when I participated in evaluating a youth training program at a club in Ho Chi Minh City, I discovered that 12-year-old students were being taught serving technique completely different from ITF standards. It was not the coach's fault — he was a former national champion with 20 years of experience. That was the problem of a system lacking mechanisms to update knowledge and standardize curricula.

Second gap: Lack of continuous competition system for youth. According to VTF data, 2026 had only 23 officially recognized youth tournaments nationwide, with a total of 1,847 competition instances (completed matches). For comparison, Japan — a market I studied extensively during 2026-2026 — has over 400 official youth tournaments each year, with over 80,000 competition instances.

This number is not just about quantity. It reflects a reality: young Vietnamese players lack opportunities to "learn by competing" — a process that youth development experts call "competition-based learning." A player can train excellently in the gym, but without enough actual matches to test those skills, that training will not translate into competitive ability.

Third gap: Unsustainable business model. Most tennis clubs in Vietnam operate on a "court rental" model — income primarily from court rentals and private coaching. This model has short-term stability, but limits the ability to invest in infrastructure, coach training, and youth talent development. A club can survive, but struggle to create a systematic athlete development system.

CONTRARIAN VIEW: WHY "INVESTING IN INFRASTRUCTURE" IS NOT ENOUGH?

Many reports on Vietnamese tennis conclude that the solution is to "invest more in infrastructure" — build more courts, open more centers, increase state budget. I believe that is a correct but insufficient answer, and sometimes it is a way to dodge the deeper issue.

Based on my experience following matches across developing markets — from Thailand to Indonesia, from Malaysia to the Philippines — I have noticed a repeating pattern: these countries build more courts, open more academies, but international tennis results do not improve significantly. Why? They invest in the visible, but overlook the invisible: coaching systems, continuous competition chains, and a culture of healthy competition.

Thailand has over 500 public and private tennis courts, but as of 2026 only has one player (Lloyd Harris, actually a South African citizen but sponsored by Thai businesses) in the top 100. When I interviewed a veteran coach in Bangkok in 2026, he said a sentence I still remember: "We have many courts, but we lack people who know how to build athletes from those courts."

For Vietnam, the real challenge is not how many more courts to build, but how many of them can become "talent factories" — places that not only teach technique, but also create competitive environments, develop match psychology, and connect with the international competition system.

A reality few mention: the cost to take a young Vietnamese player from "has potential" to "can compete at ITF Futures level" is estimated at approximately 800 million to 1.2 billion VND per year, including coaching, competition, nutrition, and travel. With current average income levels, this is a figure most families cannot afford to cover on their own, and the state budget is also insufficient to support systematically.

This is why I believe the "corporate sponsorship + private academy" model could be the key — but requires coordination with VTF to create an interconnected training system, rather than isolated projects operating on their own logic.

COMPARISON: VIETNAM AND COMPETING MARKETS

To position Vietnam in the regional picture, I analyzed data from 8 Asian countries developing tennis: Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Myanmar, Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam.

In terms of number of players in the top 1000 ATP/WTA, Vietnam currently has 3 players (Ly Hoang Nam, Nguyen Van Phuong, and a rising female player), ranking 5th in the group, behind Thailand (12), Malaysia (8), Philippines (7), and Indonesia (5). This is a middle position — not bad, but not something to be proud of.

However, the notable point is the growth rate. During 2026-2026, the number of tennis tournaments held in Vietnam increased by 67%, higher than Thailand's 41% and Philippines' 38%. This is a sign of a warming market, and the opportunity lies in converting "tournament quantity" into "player quality" — which is far from simple.

One indicator I often use to assess the real sporting strength of a country: the conversion rate from "recreational players" to "competitive athletes." In Japan, this rate is approximately 0.3% — meaning for every 333 regular players, there is 1 who reaches competitive level. In Vietnam, based on my estimates using VTF data, this rate is only about 0.08% — four times lower than Japan. This figure shows that the training and talent identification system needs significant improvement.

CONCLUSION: THREE THINGS NEED TO HAPPEN FOR VIETNAMESE TENNIS TO REALLY EXPLODE

After analyzing hundreds of reports, data, and real-world observations, I believe Vietnamese tennis has potential, but that potential will only be realized if three things happen simultaneously.

First, VTF needs to create a continuous, standardized youth competition chain. This is not about organizing a few more tournaments, but building a hierarchical system from local to national level, with clear promotion and relegation mechanisms. Every young player needs at least 30-40 official matches per year to develop competitive skills.

Second, private academies need to be linked with the state system. Rather than operating in isolation, academies like Hanoi Tennis Academy, Nick Bollettieri Vietnam, and VTF Academy need mechanisms to share resources, jointly train coaches, and create clear development pathways for students.

Third, there needs to be at least one "flag-bearer" — a player achieving a breakthrough result to inspire. History shows that every wave of tennis development in a country starts from one breakthrough name. When Li Na won the Australian Open in 2026, the number of Chinese children starting tennis increased 23% that year. When Kei Nishikori reached the US Open final in 2026, academies in Japan recorded a 31% increase in registrations. Vietnam needs a "Vietnamese Li Na" — and to create that person, systematic investment is needed, not luck.

Vietnamese tennis does not lack potential. It lacks a system good enough to turn potential into performance. And that is the work of those operating the sport — not of reports full of ambition but lacking implementation roadmaps.

CLOSING: DO NOT LET FAKE GROWTH MAKE US CELEBRATE EARLY

Every year, industry reports show Vietnamese tennis is growing — more courts, more tournaments, more players. Those numbers are not wrong. But they do not reflect the full picture.

A sport is not measured only by the number of courts or tournaments. It is measured by its ability to produce athletes who can compete at the highest level, by the strength of its coaching system, and by the sustainability of its business model.

I have been in Vietnam for 8 years. I have witnessed this sport's development from the perspective of a consultant, an observer, and sometimes a fan. And I believe Vietnam can do it — but not by continuing on the current path.

The question is not "Can Vietnam become a tennis powerhouse?" The question is "Is Vietnam ready to change its approach to turn that dream into reality?" And the answer, in my view, lies in the decisions of those holding the sport's fate in the next 5 years.

---

This article is based on the author's observations and analysis during 2026-2026. Figures are for reference and may be updated according to official reports from VTF and ITF.